Irving ZC12-0081
Rezoning, from R-MF-2 to C-C.
Rezoning request for the property at 3931 from R-MF-2 (Residential Multi-Family) to C-C (Commercial). Limited details are provided on this agenda item.
See what’s planned. Find your next opportunity.
Follow planning and zoning changes in your area — without checking every city website.
We monitor planning and zoning activity across the cities we cover, so you don’t have to. Track proposed developments and zoning changes in your metro, see who’s filing, review the source documents where available, and get email alerts for projects matching your selected locations and keywords.
Recent observed examples in DFW
The most recently processed rezonings across the metro whose hearing has passed or is not yet scheduled, as the packets state it.
Irving 2026-312-ZC
Rezoning for Auto service and repair facility with a spec building containing two bay doors, from S-P-1 – (C-OU-2) "Detailed Site Plan – Commercial Outdoor 2" to C-OU-2 "Commercial Outdoor 2", 0.29 acres.
Rezoning of 0.29-acre vacant property from S-P-1 (C-OU-2) back to base C-OU-2 zoning to permit auto repair and service facility with a spec building. The rezoning eliminates a 2023 site plan approval and returns the property to its original commercial outdoor zoning, which is compatible with surrounding auto sales and light industrial uses.
Irving 2026-307-ZC
Rezoning for Manufacturing/warehouse with approximately 15-20% assembly activities; office-based technology campus, from ML-20a and State Highway 161 Overlay to S-P-2 for ML-20a, 9.82 acres.
Brock Solutions requests rezoning of 9.82 acres from ML-20a with State Highway 161 Overlay to allow manufacturing/warehouse as a permitted use, while converting the existing office campus to a technology and assembly facility with 15-20% indoor assembly activities. The proposal includes a companion Comprehensive Plan future land use amendment from Business/Office to Manufacturing/Warehouse, with City staff recommending approval.
- Searchable local project records
- Source documents where available
- Matching email alerts
Public Planning & Zoning agendas from 123 DFW municipalities, read as each packet is captured. We extract the cases our reader supports; coverage and field completeness vary by city and packet. Alerts follow the processing of a matching case. Coverage →
123
Cities covered
4,750
Cases tracked
2 days
Portal publication → case on file (median, packets fetched in the last 30 days, archive backfills excluded)
5 days
Median advance notice, cases processed before their hearing
See how to research a local project
Follow a historical case from Plano, in our Dallas–Fort Worth coverage, from the city's records to its source packet, and note the questions to take back to the city or your client.
Watch the walkthrough · 2:34
Recorded September 2026 using historical records; the site may have changed since. Not a live feed.
Read the transcript
You are a real estate broker, builder or land buyer, and a client asks: what is being proposed around this area? P&Z Radar helps you investigate planning and zoning records in the places it covers. Let’s use Plano as an example. We’ll find a case, inspect what the record says, and identify the questions worth taking back to the city or your client.
First, check coverage. A city name alone is not enough: look at the source status and when its portal was read. This tells you where to start and where gaps may remain. P&Z Radar works from captured public documents, so the timing and detail depend on the city’s records. Once you know your market is represented, you can make the search much more specific.
On Projects, choose Plano. The table gives you case identifiers, locations, types and available details. You can use the other filters to focus your research further. Notice the label: this public page is a historical archive, not the full stream of upcoming cases. It is useful for seeing the kind of information available and understanding activity already on file before you decide whether monitoring is right for you.
Open a case and read the fields in context. Who is named? What use is proposed? Which location and hearing date appear? Where is the source packet? Those are useful inputs to a client conversation or a research brief. A staff recommendation is not the same as a final decision. If a summary and a status disagree, go to the source and resolve that difference before repeating either as a fact.
For a broker, this might raise a question about activity near a listing. For a land team, it might identify a proposed use worth investigating. For an engineering firm, it might show an applicant or project type to research. The next step is not to assume the land is available or the project approved. It is to carry better questions and a source link into the next conversation.
If that research is useful, the free city trial is the next place to look. Its page explains the recent cases and follow-on updates you can evaluate without a card. Review the city you select and the current terms before starting. Begin with one market you know well, compare the records with the city’s own source, and judge whether this saves you useful research time. That is a practical way to test P&Z Radar.
Why these records matter
Notice rarely reaches you. Where a city mails notice, it usually goes only to owners within a set distance of the site — often a few hundred feet, though the rule varies by state and city. Own land across the road or sit under contract nearby and you may be outside it, with no letter on the way.
The window can be short. Many cities post agendas close to their legal minimum, so a case can be filed, heard and decided between two weekly portal checks. Among the cases we processed before their hearing, the median advance notice is 5 days — a median across that population, not a promise for every case or city.
What that looks like: land going multi-family a block from your next closing; a neighbour assembling next to your holdings; a staff report recommending denial on a tract you’d buy at the right basis; a specific-use permit on the corner your listing faces.
More than a filing alert
Follow a case, not just a filing
First observation, hearing scheduled, continued, advanced from Planning & Zoning to Council — each stage as we observe it on the agendas.
Know which deals are in trouble
We flag cases where the packet’s staff recommendation is denial, or that keep being continued. A switch sends you only those. That is a staff recommendation or a scheduling signal, not an official denial: we read agendas, not votes.
Watch your own land
Add properties you own or have under contract and pick a radius. Anything filed near one is reported with its distance and the property it’s next to — whether or not it matches your keywords. Texas cities are only required to mail notice to owners within 200 feet of a site; our default ring is 1,000 feet.
How it works
- We check the portals. Each covered city’s P&Z agenda page, repeatedly; the coverage page shows when each was last read successfully. Special meetings and revised agendas are read when the portal lists them.
- The packet is read for you. The cases our reader supports become structured data: location, acreage, current and requested zoning, petitioner, owner, hearing date, and the staff recommendation where the packet states one. Fields the packet omits stay blank.
- You get only your matches. Set counties and keywords — “multi-family,” “SUP,” a competitor’s LLC, a road corridor. We email you when a case is processed, and nothing when it doesn’t match.
This replaces checking dozens of portals by hand and reading packets that run to hundreds of pages; a match reaches you as a short email once the captured packet is processed. Packets beyond our size limits are read as a bounded prefix.
What an alert looks like
|
Who it’s for
Builders and development companies, brokers, land acquisition and assemblage teams, civil engineers and planners — and anyone following planning and zoning.
Builders and land acquisition teams
Rezonings and SUPs with acreage, requested zoning and petitioner as the packets list them, when the packet is captured — not when the sign goes up. A proposal is not an approval, and a staff recommendation is not a vote.
Brokers pitching listings
Know what’s moving around the property: case numbers, hearing dates, staff recommendations where stated.
Civil engineers & planners
Filings, what each city’s staff recommends, and how long items sit between stages. Outcomes are decided in minutes we don’t collect, so we won’t tell you what passed. Pull the same data by API and MCP.
Data center intelligence
Data centers are the largest land, power and construction decisions most cities will see this decade, and they surface first in the same public record as every other project: a rezoning or specific-use request, a site plan, a substation or transmission item on the agenda. P&Z Radar reads those filings and records each project’s stage and next public decision as the packets state them, linked to the packet.
The result: a searchable record of proposed campuses by metro — who is filing, where, what is requested, the staff recommendation where the packet states one, and when the commission and council meet — reviewed before publication. Track the projects that matter to you and get a short brief when something changes.
12 reviewed projects in DFW today; 31 across 7 metros; 14 reviewed policy items (ordinances, text amendments, moratoria) on the policy watch; 12 candidates awaiting review here. Each project is counted once from its reviewed records. These include historical proposals and requests to permit data-center use; the count does not establish committed development or construction.
What the section tracks
- Proposals and site plans — case, parcel, acreage, petitioner and requested zoning, as filed.
- Power, water and land — substation, transmission, water and road items filed with a project, as the packets describe them.
- Decisions — first observation, hearing scheduled, continued, advanced to Council; the staff recommendation where the packet states one.
- Community response — public comment and opposition items on the agenda.
For site selectors, utilities and suppliers, brokers and land teams, and local officials. A filing is a proposal until the commission votes and the site is permitted and built; we say what the record says and no more.
The DFW P&Z portals we check
Teal = a city we hold tracked cases from; grey = on the expansion list or no tracked cases yet; a white dot is a community covered through its county’s portal. Click a dot for the city.
The next packet is on its way. Read it before the hearing.
14 days free · $99/mo for one city, $599/mo for the whole metro · cancel anytime.
Pip
P&Z Radar AI agent · Expand
Hi, I’m Pip. How can I help?